Ripple’s Radical Call for Greener Bitcoin

Ripple's Radical Call for Greener Bitcoin

Chris Larsen says Bitcoin needs to move off Proof-of-Work to something more eco-friendly. But that looks pretty unlikely.

Ripple co-founder Chris Larsen celebrated Earth Day with a bold proposition.

He called on the Bitcoin network to move from energy guzzling proof-of-work (PoW) to a more eco-friendly system like proof-of-stake (PoS). Since such a move would require a radical change to Bitcoin’s code, I spoke with Larsen to see how serious he is—and it turns out he’s deadly serious.

According to Larsen, the crypto industry is getting beat up by progressives, many of whom fail to understand that not all blockchains are energy-intensive like Bitcoin. He says environmentalists don’t realize that, once Ethereum switches to proof-of-stake, 40% of the industry will be low-emission. And in a plug for his own network, Larsen noted that the annual energy use of Ripple’s XRP network is akin to that of 50 American homes—versus 12 million homes for Bitcoin.

Nor does Larsen buy the argument of companies like Square that suggest Bitcoin can cope with its energy issues by relying on renewables. He fears renewables will never be as cheap as fossil fuels and that opportunists will turn to places like Saudi Arabia to mine Bitcoin on the cheap—or that certain billionaires would find ways to subvert any push to mandate clean crypto energy.

“What’s to stop Peter Thiel from setting up a super tanker in the middle of the ocean, and running a bitcoin miner on super cheap coal?” asks Larsen. The only way to solve the problem, he says, is for the Bitcoin community to follow Ethereum’s example and “do the right thing” by moving away from mining.

It’s a nice idea. But I don’t think it’ll work.

For starters, unlike the Ethereum crowd, who are capable of some kumbaya moments, the Bitcoin community has always been fractious and often incapable of agreeing on even minor changes for the greater good. And any push to go green would be further stymied by the companies who have now invested billions of dollars in sophisticated hardware (like ASIC chips) and mining operations.

Meanwhile, cynics will be quick to point out that Larsen, a billionaire himself, is acting in his own interest by talking up XRP over Bitcoin, or even using the hot-button environment issue to distract from Ripple’s ongoing troubles with the SEC. That may or not be fair—Larsen, it should be noted, has given millions to environmental causes. Regardless, a serious push to move Bitcoin off PoW is not going to happen.

Bitcoin’s environmental image woes will not just go away. Companies and industries, even Big Oil, are making a serious push to go green while consumers everywhere view the environment as an existential crisis. If the crypto industry isn’t careful, broad swaths of investors will start to regard it as an unethical business akin to tobacco or fossil fuels.

Alas, the Bitcoin community’s response to all this has been disappointing. Instead of acknowledging the issue, too many influential Bitcoiners—who are otherwise fond of spouting lofty ideals—are responding to green criticism with aggression and tribal self-interest. They point out correctly that progressives are overstating the impact (Bitcoin’s footprint is still piddling compared to other industries), but have been slow to offer any solutions.

One way out of the morass may be for Bitcoin to adopt the ethos of other industries, including the airlines, and offer offsetting carbon credits. In the case of big companies, they can simply vow to pair their Bitcoin purchases with modest donations that will offset the environmental impact. Meanwhile, crypto retail giants such as Coinbase, Kraken and Robinhood can offer consumers the option to pay a tiny “green fee” when they buy Bitcoin or expand their education pages to explain the environmental impact of different cryptocurrencies. (In a similar example, many of the artists minting NFTs have been purchasing carbon-offset certificates in order to prevent blowback over the environmental impact of NFT minting on the Ethereum blockchain.)

In any case, they soon may have no choice. The environmental issues hanging over Bitcoin will not go away, and companies will have to come up with answers sooner than later.

Original Source :

If you wish to support our website and help us improve you can do it by donation. You can donate crypto directly. Just click on the banner below:

Want to receive the latest stock and cryptocurrency news and investing ideas that can help you make money ?! Subscribe to our newsletter. Enter your email below and hit the subscribe button.

If you want professional consultation regarding stock or cryptocurrency investing leave your information below and experts from our trusted partners will reach out to you


* indicates required
DigitalOcean Referral Badge
Previous articleWhy Nio Stock Is Suddenly Rising!
Next articleRipple argues SEC leveraged the power of US government in latest discovery hearing